Provides just a few commands to manage your time tracking and gets out The most important part about `ti` is that it You'll be as fast as you can type, which you should be good with anyway. If a time tracker tool makes me think for more than 3-5 seconds, I lose my line Inspired by (), which is a nice projectĪnd you should check out if you don't like `ti`. Python (from being a bash script) and has (almost) complete test coverage. ![]() `ti` is a simple command line time tracker. You can also give it human-readable times. `ti` is a small command line time tracking application. If you feel like updating the environment, run ```conda env export -f environment.yml``` and commit it to the repository. If it already exists you may have to remove it first. ![]() You can install all packages in our environment (inspect environment.yml beforehand expect 2-3 min of linking/downloading, probably more if your conda base installation is still very basic or has vastly different packages than mine) using: We develop using Anaconda with package manager (). As soon as this difference bothers me enough I will switch to storing in hledger format directly s.t. ![]() Writing line by line the way I am doing it now is starting to get slow already however (at 6KB). This leaves the following commands intact: * edit is deactivated till I figure out what it does Please let me know, so I can amend them and test accordingly. * I'm not sure which program the test cases belong to. * hl command hands over your data to hledger to perform aggregations. If you enter finish, nothing is automatically started. * interrupts are gone because the stack is complex you can call switch if you want to start work on something else. 4min, rounded up to 0.1 h seems to be the cut-off. * hledger omits tasks that are too short. Tim tries to simplify () by relying on () (which must be on your path) for number crunching. This will change "Enter Time Machine" into "Browse Other Time Machine Disks".**Note: I'm in the process of adapting the cram tests to tim this is difficult on Windows and happens only when I feel like booting up my Linux machine. Using Finder, or using Time Machine? If, at any time, you want to restore files from any Time Machine Backup, then simply hold down Option while launching Time Machine (or while clicking the icon). I can browse the old Time Machine backup, however. Anything in the log files (Console) for example? If you really want to go that way, then we need more information about the problems you're currently facing. And then this new backup, or any newer backup, can be used for a full system restore (but not using backups that were created before the deep traversal, as I think those certainly do not match your current Mac). destroying old logs.", followed by Time Machine's "Event store UUIDs don’t match Node requires deep traversal"), then maybe it will become a reliable full backup after all. If you could somehow enforce a deep traversal (for this to happen, fseventsd on your Mac must be fooled into "events log in /Volumes/. So, you've copied your documents and some more (but not the whole backup), after you installed Mac OS X (or, onto a system that had OS X pre-installed)? If so, then the old backup is simply not a good representation of your current Mac. ![]() I used the migration assistant to copy my files
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |